- Does or says something that indicates they are not consenting to sexual activity
- Does or says something to indicate they do not want to continue in activity that has already begun
- Is not capable of providing consent because they are unconscious or extremely drunk or high on drugs and are not capable of consenting
- Submits to the activity because another individual abuses their position of power, authority or trust (such as a teacher or coach)
- Consents on the behalf of someone else
Defence Against Allegations of Sexual Assault
To counter the claims of sexual, you have the following defences:- Consent: To determine if a sexual assault took place, it must be established the sexual activity occurred against the will of the alleged victim. In order for the defence to establish a reasonable doubt that that the complainant consented, it usually boils down to a credibility and reliability contest between the complainant and the accused. Both parties often have their own recollection of what happened. A good criminal defence lawyer can often successfully challenge the complainant during cross examination and obtain a not guilty verdict. In some instances, consent will be impossible to prove (i.e. where the alleged victim is mentally challenged or a minor or was very drunk or asleep at the time of the sexual activity).
- Innocence: To claim innocence, the accused must create a reasonable doubt that they could not have committed sexual assault because they were in an entirely different location at the time the assault took place. Alternatively, the accused could argue that the sexual activity did not happen and is completely fabricated. Finally, the accused may claim they have been misidentified as the perpetrator.